Voters of MSAD 46

A citizen voice for reform in Maine School Administrative District #46 (Dexter, Exeter,Garland, and Ripley).
A collaboration of Art Jette, Mel Johnson, and the interested public since 1951.
Our statement of principles: Where We Stand

Tuesday, May 01, 2007

MSAD #46 Budget 2007/08 by Voting Line

MSAD #46 Budget 2007/08 by Voting Line

2006/07
2007/08
Inc./Dec.
% change
5 Administration
241,537
259,505
17,968
7.44
6 Board of Directors
37,000
43,968
6968
18.83
7 "Principal's Office"
553,467
584,678
31,211
5.64
8 Guidance
176,779
159,810
(16,969)
-9.60
9 Library
162,596
147,893
(14,703)
-9.09
10 Special Education
1,415,274
1,538,721
123,447
8.72
11 Vocational (TCTC)
1,054,560
1,071,846
17,286
1.64
12 Athletics (Co-Curr.)
310,295
340,166
29,871
9.62
14 Transportation
511,641
537,973
26,332
5.15
15 Capital Outlay
173,116
31,191
(141,925)
-82.0
16 Operation of Plant
869,603
878,266
8,663
1.0
17 All Other (Instruction)
4,028,316
4,404,318
376,002
9.33
Total
9,534,184
9,998,335
464,151
4.87
18 Adult Education
117,570
122,038
4,468
3.80

Here's another bit of information on the proposed budget. This data is mostly from the Budget Workshop last Monday (April 23). I added the last (percentage) column.

The increases in lines 5, 6, and 7 (Administration, Board, and "Principal's Office") are pretty strong, given the recent voting history regarding those lines. Two of these lines were defeated at last years referendum, and required a District budget meeting to get by the voters. Increases in these lines appear to be double compared to others, and will play into the hand of those already claiming that administrative costs take away funds from students.

Lines 8 and 9 (Guidance and Library) show decreases because of cuts or shifts in personnel. The Library cut represents elimination of one of the two ed tech positions in the Primary/Middle School Library. Why is the position being eliminated, if it was necessary to begin with?

Line 15 (Capital Outlay) shows a strong decrease because we don't need to pay the Architect anymore. This decrease of $142,000, together with a gain of $362,000 from State reimbursement of architect fees to date, helped soften the blow of this budget. Without this shift of $500,000, the budget total would be that much higher.

Line 17 is, basically, the costs of classroom instruction, that is, salaries and benefits. As a percentage of the entire budget, it was 42% in the current year and is 44% in the proposed budget. Note that this is not all salaries and benefits; not included here are superintendent's office salaries, administrative, guidance, and library salaries, special education salaries, the salaries of bus drivers and maintenance personnel, salaries for athletic directors and coaches, and the District's portion of salaries at the Tech Center, as well as the associated benefits for each of these categories of District personnel.*

It is perhaps worth noting, as it was at the Workshop, that all of the District's contracts are up for re-negotiation next year. Don't forget, the teacher minimum salary has been increased to $30,000 and it's unlikely that teachers will be looking to accept a two tier salary structure. Expectations will be at least equivalent to boosting all teacher salary steps by the amount of the state increase to the minimum teacher salary.

Get ready!

*Update: An article in the May 2 issue of the Piscataquis Observer states that total salaries and benefits are up $579, 385, and that health benefits (a significant component of this figure) are up 8.66%.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home